Interprofessional Education Towards Interprofessional Practice: A Mixed-Methods Exploration of Respiratory Care Students and Therapists’ Perceptions

Authors

  • Ziyad F Al Nufaiei
  • Genevieve Pinto Zipp

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47672/ejhs.926
Abstract views: 188
PDF downloads: 154

Keywords:

Respiratory Care, Respiratory Therapists, Interprofessional Education, Interprofessional Practice, Team-Based, Evidence-Based Effective Care, Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale.

Abstract

Background: Respiratory care (RC) is a healthcare discipline that specializes in providing treatment for patients with acute and chronic cardiopulmonary abnormalities. Today, RC possesses a solid skill base and an expansive depth of knowledge, enabling them to provide safe, team-based, evidence-based effective care for patients. This study explores perceptions of RC students (RCS), RC faculty (RCF), and RC professionals (RCP) regarding Interprofessional Education (IPE) and Interprofessional Practice (IPP). Additionally, it identifies factors that affect perceptions of knowledge, skills, and abilities related to IPE and IPP among RCS, RCF, and RCP.

Methods: A mixed method (embedded) design was used. An online email survey questionnaire was emailed to the program directors to distribute it among their students, alumni, and faculty.  The total of 421 program directors were reached via email. Three hundred forty-five surveys were returned, with 208 surveys eligible for analysis.

Results:  The findings showed a significant main effect of professional status on the Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale (IEPS) overall score regardless of the IPE exposure. However, there was no significant difference in the average score on the competency and autonomy, perceived need for cooperation, or perception of actual cooperation. Qualitatively, it was revealed that simulation was the most useful IPE experience for promoting IPP. Additional factors such as time, attitude, experiences, cooperation, and cost were believed to affect the infusion of IPE into the academic environment.

Conclusion: Regardless of the status of RCS and RCPs exposure to IPE during their professional education, all perceived IPE as positively supporting IPP. Qualitatively, for those directly exposed to IPE, simulation was identified as the most useful IPE experience for promoting IPP.

Recommendations: IPE should be continued implemented as a strategy for the promotion of IPP, as well as the necessity for further documentation and assessment of the IPE techniques used in the academy to guarantee learning outcome accountability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Ziyad F Al Nufaiei

Assistant Professor, Respiratory Therapy Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences-Jeddah.

King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences

King Abdullah International Medical Research Center

Genevieve Pinto Zipp

Acting Program Director, PhD in Health Sciences 
Professor, Department of Interprofessional  Health Sciences & Health Administration
Director, Center for Interprofessional  Education in Health Sciences
GEM Fellow, Praxis Program of the Advanced Seminar on Mission, Center for Vocation and Servant Leadership and the Center for Catholic Studies, Bernard J. Lonergan Institute
School of Health and Medical Sciences, Seton Hall University | Interprofessional Health Sciences (IHS) Campus 

References

Barnes, T. A., Kacmarek, R. M., Kageler, W. V., Morris, M. J., & Durbin, C. G., Jr. (2011). Transitioning the respiratory therapy workforce for 2015 and beyond. Respir Care, 56(5), 681-690. doi:10.4187/rescue.01169.

Barnsteiner, J. H., Disch, J. M., Hall, L., Mayer, D., & Moore, S. M. (2007). Promoting interprofessional education. Nurs Outlook, 55(3), 144-150. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2007.03.003

CoARC. (2015). The 2015 CoARC accreditation standards for entry into respiratory care professional practice, 1-45. Retrieved from Accreditation Standards for Entry into Respiratory Care Professional Practice website: http://www.coarc.com/29.html

Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2018). Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE Publications. We are designing and conducting mixed methods research—3rd edition.

Douce, F. H., Sergakis, G., Dunlevy, C., & Varekojis, S. M. (2014). The need for and interest in the advanced respiratory therapist practitioner. Respiratory care education annual, 23, 3-7.

Hertweck, M. L., Hawkins, S. R., Bednarek, M. L., Goreczny, A. J., Schreiber, J. L., & Sterrett, S. E. (2012). Attitudes Toward Interprofessional Education: Comparing Physician Assistant and Other Health Care Professions Students. Journal Of Physician Assistant Education (Physician Assistant Education Association), 23(2), 8-15.

Ho, K., Jarvis-Selinger, S., Borduas, F., Frank, B., Hall, P., Handfield-Jones, R., &... Rouleau, M. (2008). Making interprofessional education work: The strategic roles of the academy. Academic Medicine, 83(10), 934-940. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181850a75

Holthaus, V., Sergakis, G., Rohrig, L., Wilcox, J., Thomas, E., McClerking, C., &... Nahikian-Nelms, M. (2015). The Impact of Interprofessional Simulation on Dietetic Student Perception of Communication, Decision Making, Roles, and Self-efficacy.

Kacmarek, R. M., Durbin, C. G., Barnes, T. A., Kageler, W. V., Walton, J. R., & O'Neil, E. H. (2009). Creating a vision for respiratory care in 2015 and beyond. Respir Care, 54(3), 375-389.

Kent, F., & Keating, J. (2013). Patient outcomes from a student-led interprofessional clinic in primary care. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 27(4), 336-338. doi:10.3109/13561820.2013.767226

King, A. A., Conrad, M., & Ahmed, R. A. (2013). Improving collaboration among medical, nursing and respiratory therapy students through interprofessional simulation. Journal Of Interprofessional Care, 27(3), 269-271. doi:10.3109/13561820.2012.730076

Klima, D., Hinderer, K. A., Freda, K., Winter, D., & Joyner, R. (2014). Interprofessional collaboration between two rural institutions: A simulated teaching laboratory paradigm. Respiratory care education annual, 23, 45-48.

Kolb, D. A., Boyatzis, R. E., & Mainemelis, C. (2001). Experiential learning theory: Previous research and new directions. In R. J. Sternberg, L. Zhang, R. J. (Eds.), Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles (pp. 227-247). Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

Makino, T., Shinozaki, H., Hayashi, K., Lee, B., Matsui, H., Kururi, N.,... Watanabe, H. (2013). Attitudes toward interprofessional healthcare teams: a comparison between undergraduate students and alumni. J Interprof Care, 27(3), 261-268. doi:10.3109/13561820.2012.751901

Oandasan, I., & Reeves, S. (2005). Key elements of interprofessional education. Part 2: factors, processes and outcomes. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 19 Suppl 139-48.

Panel, I. E. C. E. (2011). Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: Report of an expert panel. Retrieved from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/educationresources/ipecreport.pdf.

World Health Organization. (2010). Framework for action on Interprofessional education and collaborative practice. Retrieved from http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/70185/1/WHO_HRH_HPN_10.3_eng.pdf?ua=1.

Wilkins, R. L., Stoller, J. K., & Kacmarek, R. M. (2009). Egan's fundamentals of respiratory care (ninth ed., pp. 4-14). St. Louis: Wilke, J.

Downloads

Published

2022-02-01

How to Cite

Al Nufaiei, Z. F. ., & Zipp, G. P. . (2022). Interprofessional Education Towards Interprofessional Practice: A Mixed-Methods Exploration of Respiratory Care Students and Therapists’ Perceptions. European Journal of Health Sciences, 7(1), 13 - 22. https://doi.org/10.47672/ejhs.926

Issue

Section

Articles