ISSUES, QUESTIONS AND COMMENTARIES IN; Origins of Policy, Theories of Policy Cycle, Qualitative – Interpretive Methods in Policy Research, Deliberative Policy Analysis, Street-Level Bureaucracy, Managing Policy Networks, Advocacy Coalition Framework, Managing the Commons and Policy Decision-Making

Authors

  • Andrew Shangarai Jumanne Kenyatta University
  • Stanley Motieri Ontiri
  • Dr. Wilson Muna (PhD) Kenyatta University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47672/ajppa.393
Abstract views: 631
PDF downloads: 328

Keywords:

Origins of Policy, Theories of Policy Cycle, Qualitative – Interpretive Methods in Policy Research, Deliberative Policy Analysis, Street-Level Bureaucracy, Managing Policy Networks, Advocacy Coalition Framework, Managing the Commons, Policy Decision-Makin

Abstract

ISSUES, QUESTIONS AND COMMENTARIES IN;

Origins of Policy, Theories of Policy Cycle, Qualitative – Interpretive Methods in Policy Research, Deliberative Policy Analysis, Street-Level Bureaucracy, Managing Policy Networks, Advocacy Coalition Framework, Managing the Commons and Policy Decision-Making

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Andrew Shangarai Jumanne, Kenyatta University

PhD. Candidate, (Public Policy and Management)Department of Public Policy and Administration, Kenyatta University

Stanley Motieri Ontiri

,

PhD. Candidate, (Public Policy and Management)

Department of Public Policy and Administration,Kenyatta University

 

 

Dr. Wilson Muna (PhD), Kenyatta University

Lecturer 

 Department of Public Policy and Administration

 

 

References

Bonoli, G. (2013). The origins of active social policy: Labour market and childcare policies in a comparative perspective. Oxford University Press.

Braat, L., & Ten Brink, P. (2010). The cost of policy inaction. In The case of not meeting the.

Brodkin, E. Z. (2012). Reflections on street‐level bureaucracy: past, present, and future. Public Administration Review, 72(6), 940-949.

Cosma, H.A., & Whish, R. (2003). Soft law in the field of EU competition policy. Eur. Bus. L. R., 14, 25.

Dohler, M. (1995). The state of architect of political order: political dynamics in German health care. Governance, 8(3), 380-404.

Engelstein, L. (1995). Soviet policy toward male homosexuality: Its origins and historical roots. Journal of homosexuality, 29(2-3), 155-178.

Fairfield, G., Hunter, D. J., Mechanic, D., & Rosleff, F. (1997). Managed care: origins, principles, and evolution. Bmj, 314(7097), 1823.

Gamlen, A. (2006). Diaspora engagement policies: what are they and what kinds of state that use them?

Haque, M. S. (2004). New public management: Origins, dimensions, and critical implications. Public administration and public policy, 1, 126.

Harding, R. (2006). Ecologically sustainable development: origins, implementation and challenges. Desalination, 187(1-3), 229-239.

Hudson, B. (1989). Michael Lipsky and street level bureaucracy: a neglected perspective. Disability and dependency, 41-52.

Ifanti, A.A., Argyriou, A.A., Kalofonou, F. H., & Kalofonos, H. P. (2013). Financial crisis and austerity measures in Greece: their impact on health promotion policies and public health care. Public Health 113(1-2), 8-12.

Kamuzora, P. (2006). Non-decision making in occupational health policies in developing countries. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, 12(1), 65-71.

Majone, G. (1993). The European Community between social policy and social regulation. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 31(2), 153-170.

Morgan, K. J., & Zippel, K. (2003). Paid to care: The origins and effects of care leave policies in Western Europe. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 10(1), 49-85.

Nash, G. D (1960). Franklin D. Roosevelt and labor the world war 1 origins of early new policy. Labor and History, 1(1), 39-52.

Page, E. C. (2006). The origins of policy. The Oxford handbook of public policy, 207-227.

Scocpol, T. & Amenta, E. (1986). States and social policies. Annual Review of Sociology, 12(1), 131-157.

Scott, P. G. (1997). Assessing determinants of bureaucratic discretion: An experiment in street-level decision making. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7(1), 35-58.

Utomo, I. D., & McDonald, P. (2009). Adolescent reproductive health in Indonesia: contested values and policy inaction. Studies in family planning, 40(2), 133-146.

Tanaka, K. (2011). Review of policies and measures of energy efficiency in industry sector. Energy policy, 39(10), 6532-6550.

Winkler, H., Spalding-Fecher, R., mwakasonda, S., & Davidson, O. (2002). Sustainable development policies and measures. Options for Protecting the Climate; World Resource Institute: Washington, DC, USA.

Birkland, T. A. (2017). Agenda setting in public policy. In Handbook of public policy analysis (pp. 89-104). Routledge

Coglianese, C., & D'Ambrosio, J. (2007). Policymaking under pressure: the perils of incremental responses to climate change. Conn. L. Rev., 40, 1411.

Dredge, D. (2006). Policy networks and the local organisation of tourism. Tourism management, 27(2), 269-280.

Dunlop, C. A. (2016). Knowledge, epistemic communities, and agenda setting. In Handbook of Public Policy Agenda Setting. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Fortunato, J., & Martin, S. (2016). The Intersection of Agenda-Setting, the Media Environment, and Election Campaign Laws. Journal of Information Policy, 6, 129-153. doi:10.5325/jinfopoli.6.2016.0129.

Fowler, F. C. (2000). Policy studies for educational leaders: An introduction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.

Gomez-Mejia, D. H., Balkin, R. S., & Cardy, R. M. (2008). Public Administration: Understanding Management, Politics, and Law in the Public Sector. McGraw Hill Education

Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1996). Cumulative research knowledge and social policy formulation: The critical role of meta-analysis. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2(2), 324.

Jann, W., & Wegrich, K. (2007). Theories of the policy cycle. Handbook of public policy analysis: Theory, politics, and methods, 125, 43-62.

Kessler, M. (1990). Legal Mobilization for Social Reform: Power and the Politics of Agenda Setting. Law & Society Review, 24(1), 121-143. doi:10.2307/3053789.

Linder, S. H., & Peters, B. G. (1987). A design perspective on policy implementation: The fallacies of misplaced prescription. Review of Policy Research, 6(3), 459-475.

McCombs, M. (2002, June). The agenda-setting role of the mass media in the shaping of public opinion. In Mass Media Economics 2002 Conference, London School of Economics: http://sticerd. lse. ac. uk/dps/extra/McCombs. pdf.

McCombs, M. (1997). Building consensus: The news media's agenda-setting roles. Political Communication, 14(4), 433-443.

McDonnell, L. M., & Elmore, R. F. (1987). Getting the job done: Alternative policy instruments. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 9(2), 133-152.

Mintrom, M., & Vergari, S. (1998). Policy networks and innovation diffusion: The case of state education reforms. The Journal of Politics, 60(1), 126-148.

Mucciaroni, G. (1992). The garbage can model & the study of policy making: A critique. Polity, 24(3), 459-482.

Sidney, M. S. (2017). Policy formulation: design and tools. In Handbook of public policy analysis (pp. 105-114). Routledge.

Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Gomez, L. M. (2006). Policy implementation and cognition. New directions in educational policy implementation, 47-64.

Skjærseth, J. B., & Wettestad, J. (2016). EU emissions trading: initiation, decision-making and implementation. Routledge.

Stavins, R. N. (1997). Policy instruments for climate change: how can national governments address a global problem. U. Chi. Legal F., 293.

Tepper, S. J. (2004). Setting Agendas and Designing Alternatives: Policymaking and the Strategic Role of Meetings 1. Review of Policy Research, 21(4), 523-542.

Timothy, D. J., & Tosun, C. (2003). Appropriate planning for tourism in destination communities: Participation, incremental growth and collaboration. Tourism in destination communities, 181-204.

Beamer, G. (2002). Elite Interviews and State Politics Research. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 2(1), 86-96. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40421450

Bohnsack, R. (2010). Documentary Method and Group Discussions. In Bohnsack R., Pfaff N., & Weller W. (Eds.), Qualitative Analysis and Documentary Method: In International Educational Research (pp. 99-124). Opladen; Farmington Hills: Verlag Barbara Budrich. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvbkjvmn.7

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative research journal, 9(2), 27-40.

Cochrane, W. (1949). Research in Public Policy. Journal of Farm Economics, 31(1), 700-711. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1232894.

Fedyuk, O., & Zentai, V. (2018). The Interview in Migration Studies: A Step towards a Dialogue and Knowledge Co-production? In Qualitative Research in European Migration Studies (pp. 171-188). Springer, Cham.

Heary, C. M., & Hennessy, E. (2002). The use of focus group interviews in pediatric health care research. Journal of pediatric psychology, 27(1), 47-57

Hochschild, J. L. (2009). Conducting intensive interviews and elite interviews. In Workshop on interdisciplinary standards for systematic qualitative research. National Science Foundation.

Lavis, J., Davies, H., Oxman, A., Denis, J. L., Golden-Biddle, K., & Ferlie, E. (2005). Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-making. Journal of health services research & policy, 10(1_suppl), 35-48.

Littig, B. (2009). Interviewing the elite—Interviewing experts: Is there a difference? In Interviewing experts (pp. 98-113). Palgrave Macmillan, London.

Labuschagne, A. (2003). Qualitative research-airy fairy or fundamental? The qualitative report, 8(1), 100-103.

Mosley, L. (Ed.). (2013). Interview research in political science. Cornell University Press.

Ozanne, J., & Anderson, L. (2010). Community Action Research. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 29(1), 123-137. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20798402.

Ozanne, J., Saatcioglu, B., & John Deighton (2008). Participatory Action Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 423-439. doi:10.1086/586911

Payne, G., & Payne, J. (2004). Key concepts in social research. Sage.

Percy, W. H., Kostere, K., & Kostere, S. (2015). Generic qualitative research in psychology. The Qualitative Report, 20(2), 76-85.

Punch, K. F., (2009). Introduction to Research Methods in Education. SAGE Publications Ltd.

Richards, D. (1996). Elite interviewing: Approaches and pitfalls. Politics, 16(3), 199-204.

Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., Nicholls, C. M., & Ormston, R. (Eds.). (2013). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. sage.

Ritchie, J., & Spencer, L. (2002). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. The qualitative researcher’s companion, 573(2002), 305-29.

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Sage publications.

Zuber-Skerritt, O. (Ed.). (2003). New directions in action research. Routledge

Aninat, C., Londregan, J., Navia, P., & Vial, J. (2006). Political institutions, policymaking processes, and policy outcomes in Chile. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank, 1-64.

Burris, B. H. (1989). Technocratic Organization and Control. Organization Studies, 10(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084068901000101

Conzelmann, T. (1995). Networking and the politics of EU regional policy: Lessons from north Rhine‐Westphalia, Nord‐Pas de Calais and North West England. Regional & Federal Studies, 5(2), 134-172.

Dryzek, J. S. (2006). Policy analysis as critique. The Oxford handbook of public policy, 190-203.

Dryzek, J. S. (2002). Policy analysis and planning: From science to argument. In Argument Turn Policy Anal Plan (pp. 221-240). Routledge.

Gottweis, H. (2006). Argumentative policy analysis. Handbook of public policy, 461-479.

Fischer, F., & Gottweis, H. (Eds.). (2012). The argumentative turn revisited: Public policy as communicative practice. Duke University Press.

Hajer, M. A., Hoppe, R., & Jennings, B. (1993). The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Duke University Press.

Fischer, F. (2003). Beyond empiricism: policy analysis as deliberative practice. Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society, 209-227.

Hajer, M. (2003). Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void. Policy sciences, 36(2), 175-195.

Hajer, M., Hajer, M. A., Wagenaar, H., Goodin, R. E., & Barry, B. (Eds.). (2003). Deliberative policy analysis: understanding governance in the network society. Cambridge University Press.

McKenna, B., J., & Graham, P. (2000). Technocratic discourse: A primer, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 30(3), 219-247.

O'Toole, L. J. (1997). Networking requirements, institutional capacity, and implementation gaps in transitional regimes: the case of acidification policy in Hungary. Journal of European Public Policy, 4(1), 1-17.

Song, H. Z. (2003). Networking Lessons from Taiwan and South Korea. United Nations Public Administration Network (UNPAC). Url: http://unpan1. un. org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/apcity/unpan022359. pdf.

Thakur, R., & Weiss, T. G. (2009). United Nations “Policy”: An argument with three illustrations. International Studies Perspectives, 10(1), 18-35.

Torgerson, D. (1986). Between knowledge and politics: Three faces of policy analysis. Policy sciences, 19(1), 33-59.

Arnold, G. (2015). Street-level policy entrepreneurship. Public Management Review, 17, (3), 307-327.

Brodkin, E. Z. (2003). Street-level research: Policy at the front lines. Policy into action: Implementation research and welfare reform, 145-164.

Crook, R., & Ayee, J. (2006). Urban service partnership, ‘street-level’ and environmental sanitasation in Kumasi and Accra, Ghana: coping with organizational change in the public bureaucracy. Development Policy Review, 24(1), 51-73

Erasmus, E. (2014). The use of street-level bureaucracy theory in health policy analysis in low-and-middle-income countries: a meta-ethnographic synthesis. Health policy and planning, 29(3) 70-78

Evans, T., & Harris, J. (2004). Street-level bureaucracy, social work and the (exaggerated) death of discretion. The British Journal Social Work, 34(6), 871-895.

Fineman, S. (1998). Street-level bureaucrats and the social construction of environmental control. Organization Studies, 19(6), 953-974.

Hill, H.C. (2003). Understanding implementation: Street-level bureaucrat’ resources for reform. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(3), 265-282.

Hudson, B. (1989). Michael Lipsky and street level bureaucracy: a neglected perspective. Disability and dependency, 41-52.

Keiser, L. R., (2010). Understanding street-level bureaucrats’ decision making: Determine eligibility in the social security disability program. Public Administrative Review, 70(2), 247-257.

Linder, S.H & Peters, B. G. (1987). A design perspective on policy implementation: The fallacies of misplaced prescription. Review of Policy Research, 6(3), 459-475.

Lipsky, M. (1971). Street-level bureaucracy and the analysis of urban reform. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 6(4), 391-409.

Midland, R. E (1995). Synthesizing the implementation literature: The ambiguity-conflict model of policy implementation. Journal of public administration research and theory, 5(2), 145-147.

Meyers, M. K., Vorsanger, S., Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (2007). Street-level bureaucrats and implementation of public policy. The handbook of public administration, 153-163.

McLaughlin, M.W. (1987). Learning from experience: Lessons from policy implementation. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 9(2), 171-178.

Moynihan & Soss (2014). Policy feedback and the politics of administration. Public Administration Review, 74(3), 320-332.

Moore, S. T. (1989). The theory of street-level bureaucracy: a positive critique. Administrative & Society, 19(1), 74-94

Skill, E. E., (2008). Understanding sport clubs as sport policy implementers: a theoretical framework for the analysis of the implementation of central sport policy through local and voluntary sport organization. International review for sociology of sports, 43(2), 181-200.

Sutton, R. (1999). The policy process: an overview (p. 35). London: Overseas Development Institute.

Vinzant, J., & Crothers, L. (1996). Street-level leadership: rethinking the role of public servants in contemporary governance. The American review of public administration, 26(4), 457-476.

Weatherly, R. & Lipsky, M. (1977). Street-level bureaucrats and institutional innovation: Implementing special-education reform, Harvard education review, 47 (2), 171-197.

Agranoff, R. (2006). Inside collaborative networks: Ten lessons for public managers. Public administration review, 66, 56-65.

Agranoff, R. (2007). Managing within networks: Adding value to public organizations. Georgetown University Press.

Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2001). Big questions in public network management research. Journal of public administration research and theory, 11(3), 295-326.

Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (1999). Managing in network settings. Review of Policy Research, 16(1), 18-41. ĵ

Belussi, F., & Staber, U. H. (Eds.). (2012). Managing networks of creativity (Vol. 19). Routledge.

Howlett, M. (2000). Managing the “hollow state”: Procedural policy instruments and modern governance. Canadian Public Administration, 43(4), 412-431.

Klijn, E. H., Koppenjan, J., & Termeer, K. (1995). Managing networks in the public sector: a theoretical study of management strategies in policy networks. Public administration, 73(3), 437-454.

Klijn, E. H. (1996). Analyzing and managing policy processes in complex networks: A theoretical examination of the concept policy network and its problems. Administration & Society, 28(1), 90-119.

Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. F. (2000). Public management and policy networks: foundations of a network approach to governance. Public Management an International Journal of Research and Theory, 2(2), 135-158.

Koppenjan, J. F. M., & Klijn, E. H. (2004). Managing uncertainties in networks: a network approach to problem solving and decision making (Vol. 40). London: Routledge.

Lubell, M., & Fulton, A. (2008). Local Policy Networks and Agricultural Watershed Management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART, 18(4), 673-696. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/25096389

McGuire, M. (2002). Managing networks: Propositions on what managers do and why they do it. Public administration review, 62(5), 599-609.

Rhodes, R. A. (2006). Policy network analysis. The Oxford handbook of public policy, 423-445.

Struyk, R. (2002). Management of Transnational Think Tank Networks. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 15(4), 625-638. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20020140. Fowler, F. C. (2000). Policy studies for educational leaders: An introduction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.

Cook, F. L., Tyler, T. R., Goetz, E. G., Gordon, M. T., Protess, D., Leff, D. R., & Molotch, H. L. (1983). Media and agenda setting: Effects on the public, interest group leaders, policy makers, and policy. Public opinion quarterly, 47(1), 16-

Mintrom, M., & Vergari, S. (1998). Policy networks and innovation diffusion: The case of state education reforms. The Journal of Politics, 60(1), 126-148.

Stone, D. (2004). Transfer agents and global networks in the ‘transnationalization’of policy. Journal of European public policy, 11(3), 545-566.

Marin, B., & Mayntz, R. (1991). Policy networks: Empirical evidence and theoretical considerations. Campus Verlag

Ohly, S., Kase, R., & Škerlavaj, M. (2010). Networks for generating and for validating ideas: The social side of creativity. Innovation, 12(1), 41-52.

Bilton, C. (2014). Manageable creativity. In Creativity and Cultural Policy (pp. 31-46). Routledge.

Borén, T., & Young, C. (2013). Getting creative with the ‘creative city’? Towards new perspectives on creativity in urban policy. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(5), 1799-1815.

Karlsson, C. (2011). Clusters, networks and creativity. Handbook of Creative Cities, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 85-114.

Ghanem, S. (1997). Filling in the tapestry: The second level of agenda setting. Communication and democracy: Exploring the intellectual frontiers in agenda-setting theory, 3-14.

Weaver, D. H. (2007). Thoughts on agenda setting, framing, and priming. Journal of communication, 57(1), 142-147.

Marsh, D., & Smith, M. (2000). Understanding policy networks: towards a dialectical approach. Political studies, 48(1), 4-21.

Wang, S. (2008). Changing models of China's policy agenda setting. Modern China, 34(1), 56-87.

Birkland, T. A. (1998). Focusing events, mobilization, and agenda setting. Journal of public policy, 18(1), 53-74.

Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2004). Representation and agenda setting. Policy Studies Journal, 32(1), 1-24.

Pralle, S. B. (2009). Agenda-setting and climate change. Environmental Politics, 18(5), 781-799.

Nohrstedt, D. (2011). Shifting resources and venues producing policy change in contested subsystems: a case study of Swedish signals intelligence policy. Policy Studies Journal, 39(3), 461-484.

Weible, C. M. (2006). An advocacy coalition framework approach to stakeholder analysis: Understanding the political context of California marine protected area policy. Journal of public administration research and theory, 17(1), 95-117.

Kübler, D. (2001). Understanding policy change with the advocacy coalition framework: an application to Swiss drug policy. Journal of European public policy, 8(4), 623-641.

Weible, C. M. (2008). Expert‐based information and policy subsystems: a review and synthesis. Policy Studies Journal, 36(4), 615-635.

Sabatier, P. A., & Weible, C. M. (Eds.). (2014). Theories of the policy process. Westview Press.

Smith, A. (2000). Policy networks and advocacy coalitions: explaining policy change and stability in UK industrial pollution policy. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 18(1), 95-114.

Timmermans, A., & Scholten, P. (2006). The political flow of wisdom: science institutions as policy venues in The Netherlands. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(7), 1104-1118.

Weible, C. M. (2008). Expert‐based information and policy subsystems: a review and synthesis. Policy Studies Journal, 36(4), 615-635.

Littoz‐Monnet, A. (2013). Explaining Policy Conflict across Institutional Venues: European Union‐Level Struggles over the Memory of the Holocaust. JCMS: Journal of common market studies, 51(3), 489-504.

Sloboda, M., Szabó-Gilinger, E., Vigers, D., & Šimičić, L. (2010). Carrying out a language policy change: Advocacy coalitions and the management of linguistic landscape. Current Issues in Language Planning, 11(2), 95-113.

Huitema, D., & Meijerink, S. V. (2010). Realizing water transitions: the role of policy entrepreneurs in water policy change-www-publicatie.

Wison, C. A. (2000). Policy regimes and policy change. Journal of public policy, 20(3), 247-274.

Mizrahi, T., & Rosenthal, B. B. (2001). Complexities of coalition building: Leaders' successes, strategies, struggles, and solutions. Social work, 46(1), 63-78.

Reisman, J., Gienapp, A., & Stachowiak, S. (2007). A guide to measuring advocacy and policy. Baltimore: Organisational Research Services (www. organizational research. com/publications/a_guide_to_measuring_advocacy_and_policy. pdf).

Dziengel, L. (2010). Advocacy coalitions and punctuated equilibrium in the same-sex marriage debate: Learning from pro-LGBT policy changes in Minneapolis and Minnesota. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 22(1-2), 165-182.

Metzger, M. E., Alexander, J. A., & Weiner, B. J. (2005). The effects of leadership and governance processes on member participation in community health coalitions. Health Education & Behavior, 32(4), 455-473.

Bennett, C. J., & Howlett, M. (1992). The lessons of learning: Reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change. Policy sciences, 25(3), 275-294.

Sabatier, P. A. (1988). An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy sciences, 21(2-3), 129-168.

Weible, C. M. (2005). Beliefs and perceived influence in a natural resource conflict: An advocacy coalition approach to policy networks. Political Research Quarterly, 58(3), 461-475.

Weible, C. M. (2006). An advocacy coalition framework approach to stakeholder analysis: Understanding the political context of California marine protected area policy. Journal of public administration research and theory, 17(1), 95-117.

Sabatier, P. A. (1998). The advocacy coalition framework: revisions and relevance for Europe. Journal of European public policy, 5(1), 98-130.

Mintrom, M., & Vergari, S. (1996). Advocacy coalitions, policy entrepreneurs, and policy change. Policy studies journal, 24(3), 420-434.

Wolsink, M. (2004). Policy beliefs in spatial decisions: contrasting core beliefs concerning space-making for waste infrastructure. Urban studies, 41(13), 2669-2690.

Mithas, S., Ramasubbu, N., & Sambamurthy, V. (2011). How information management capability influences firm performance. MIS quarterly, 35(1), 237.

Pitt, J., & Schaumeier, J. (2012, September). Provision and appropriation of common-pool resources without full disclosure. In International Conference on Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems (pp. 199-213). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

Baerlein, T., Kasymov, U., & Zikos, D. (2015). Self-governance and sustainable common pool resource management in Kyrgyzstan. Sustainability, 7(1), 496-521.

Wolsink, M. (2012). The research agenda on social acceptance of distributed generation in smart grids: Renewable as common pool resources. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(1), 822-835.

Wade, R. (1987). The management of common property resources: collective action as an alternative to privatisation or state regulation. Cambridge journal of economics, 11(2), 95-106.

Fisher, B., Kulindwa, K., Mwanyoka, I., Turner, R. K., & Burgess, N. D. (2010). Common pool resource management and PES: lessons and constraints for water PES in Tanzania. Ecological Economics, 69(6), 1253-1261.

Sadeque, S. Z. (2000). Nature’s bounty or scarce commodity: Competition and consensus over groundwater use in rural Bangladesh. Negotiating water rights, 269-291.

Klare, M. T. (2011). Resource competition and world politics in the twenty-first century. In Warfare Ecology (pp. 27-31). Springer, Dordrecht.

Pondy, L. R. (1967). Organizational conflict: Concepts and models. Administrative science quarterly, 296-320.

Libecap, G. D. (2008). State regulation of open-access, common-pool resources. In Handbook of new institutional economics (pp. 545-572). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

Njiru, B. N. (2012). Climate change, resource competition, and conflict amongst pastoral communities in Kenya. In Climate change, human security and violent conflict (pp. 513-527). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

Grossman, H. I., & Mendoza, J. (2003). Scarcity and appropriative competition. European Journal of Political Economy, 19(4), 747-758.

Schlager, E., & Heikkila, T. (2011). Left high and dry? Climate change, common‐pool resource theory, and the adaptability of western water compacts. Public Administration Review, 71(3), 461-470.

Baerlein, T., Kasymov, U., & Zikos, D. (2015). Self-governance and sustainable common pool resource management in Kyrgyzstan. Sustainability, 7(1), 496-521.

Le Billon, P. (2001). The political ecology of war: natural resources and armed conflicts. Political geography, 20(5), 561-584.

Gething, P. W., Noor, A. M., Gikandi, P. W., Ogara, E. A., Hay, S. I., Nixon, M. S., ... & Atkinson, P. M. (2006). Improving imperfect data from health management information systems in Africa using space–time geostatistics. PLoS Medicine, 3(6), e271.

Ostrom, E. (2008). The challenge of common-pool resources. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 50(4), 8-21.

Ostrom, E. (1994). Neither market nor state: Governance of common-pool resources in the twenty-first century. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.

Wehrmann, B. (2008). Land Conflicts: A practical guide to dealing with land disputes. Eschborn: GTZ.

Ayling, R. D., & Kelly, K. (1997). Dealing with conflict: natural resources and dispute resolution. The Commonwealth Forestry Review, 182-185.

Mansell, R. (2013). Employing digital crowdsourced information resources: Managing the emerging information commons. International Journal of the Commons, 7(2), 255-277.

Hess, C., & Ostrom, E. (2006). A framework for analysing the microbiological commons. International Social Science Journal, 58(188), 335-349.

Kollock, P., & Smith, M. (1996). Managing the virtual commons. Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives, 109-128.

Marcella, R., Carcary and, I., & Baxter, G. (1999). The information needs of United Kingdom members of the European Parliament (MEPs). Library Management, 20(3), 168-178.

Oh, C. H., & Rich, R. F. (1996). Explaining use of information in public policymaking. Knowledge and Policy, 9(1), 3-35.

Feldman, M. S., & March, J. G. (1981). Information in organizations as signal and symbol. Administrative science quarterly, 171-186.

Armstrong, J. S., & Brodie, R. J. (1994). Effects of portfolio planning methods on decision making: Experimental results. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 11(1), 73-84.

Gigerenzer, G., & Gaissmaier, W. (2011). Heuristic decision making. Annual review of psychology, 62, 451-482.

Cialdini, R. B. (2001). Harnessing the science of persuasion. Harvard business review, 79(9), 72-81.

Garvin, D. A., & Roberto, M. A. (2005). Change through persuasion. Harvard business review, 83, 26-33.

El-Shinnawy, M., & Vinze, A. (1998). Polarization and Persuasive Argumentation: A Study of Decision Making in Group Settings. MIS Quarterly, 22(2), 165-198. doi:10.2307/249394

Winterbottom, A., Bekker, H. L., Conner, M., & Mooney, A. (2008). Does narrative information bias individual's decision making? A systematic review. Social science & medicine, 67(12), 2079-2088.

Spiro, R. L. (1983). Persuasion in family decision-making. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(4), 393-402.

Klein, G. (2008). Naturalistic decision making. Human factors, 50(3), 456-460.

Romme, A. G. L. (2003). Making a difference: Organization as design. Organization science, 14(5), 558-573.

McElhaney, J. (2000). Persuasive Organization. Litigation, 26(3), 51-66. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/29760144

Coburn, C. E., Touré, J., & Yamashita, M. (2009). Evidence, interpretation, and persuasion: Instructional decision making at the district central office. Teachers College Record, 111(4), 1115-1161.

McDonnell, L. M. (1994). Assessment policy as persuasion and regulation. American journal of education, 102(4), 394-420.

Glimcher, P. W., & Fehr, E. (Eds.). (2013). Neuroeconomics: Decision making and the brain. Academic Press.

Wilson, C., & Dowlatabadi, H. (2007). Models of decision making and residential energy use. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour., 32, 169-203. Janssen, M. A., Holahan, R., Lee, A., & Ostrom, E. (2010). Lab experiments for the study of social-ecological systems. Science, 328(5978), 613-617.

Winkler, R. L., & Murphy, A. H. (1973). Experiments in the laboratory and the real world. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 10(2), 252-270.

Suddendorf, T., & Busby, J. (2005). Making decisions with the future in mind: Developmental and comparative identification of mental time travel. Learning and Motivation, 36(2), 110-125.

Kleinman, D. L., Serfaty, D., & Luh, P. B. (1984, June). A research paradigm for multi-human decision making. In 1984 American Control Conference (pp. 6-11). IEEE.

Bröder, A. (2003). Decision making with the" adaptive toolbox": influence of environmental structure, intelligence, and working memory load. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(4), 611.

Fishman, D. B. (1991). An introduction to the experimental versus the pragmatic paradigm in evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 14(4), 353-363.

Griffiths, A. (1999). Organizational interventions: Facing the limits of the natural science paradigm. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 589-596.

Avineri, E., & Prashker, J. N. (2003). Sensitivity to uncertainty: need for a paradigm shift. Transportation Research Record, 1854(1), 90-98.

Dimov, C., Marewski, J., & Schooler, L. (2013). Constraining ACT-R models of decision strategies: An experimental paradigm. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (Vol. 35, No. 35).

Downloads

Published

2019-08-13

How to Cite

Jumanne, A. S., Ontiri, S. M., & Muna (PhD), D. W. (2019). ISSUES, QUESTIONS AND COMMENTARIES IN; Origins of Policy, Theories of Policy Cycle, Qualitative – Interpretive Methods in Policy Research, Deliberative Policy Analysis, Street-Level Bureaucracy, Managing Policy Networks, Advocacy Coalition Framework, Managing the Commons and Policy Decision-Making. American Journal of Public Policy and Administration, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.47672/ajppa.393

Issue

Section

Articles