Assessing the Integration of Farmer Socio-Cultural Context in the Diffusion of Improved Maize Varieties in the Semi-Arid Lower Eastern Kenya

Authors

  • Emily Keles Muli PhD Student, Mass Communication, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology
  • Prof. Maurice Sakwa, PhD Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology
  • Dr. Masaya H. Chakava, PhD Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47672/ajc.2683

Keywords:

Participatory Communication, Agricultural Innovations, Farmer Values, Dialogic Interaction, Local Knowledge, Communication Strategies, Participant Engagement

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was therefore, to evaluate the extent of the integration of farmer socio-cultural context in the diffusion of improved maize varieties in the Semi-Arid Lower Eastern Kenya. Qualitative data was collected from farmers, agricultural scientists, agricultural extension officers and documents.

Materials and Methods: It was analysed using a thematic analysis method and with apriori themes developed by the researcher from the literature, principles of participatory communication approaches and the concerns of the research questions.

Findings: The study results revealed several key issues which include, Selection bias: The selection process for farmer participants in the diffusion activities was biased, favouring those with higher socio-economic status and the role of agricultural extension officers, key actors in the agricultural sector, was ignored. Overlooking farmer values on maize: The communication methods employed could not facilitate the tapping of the values farmers place on maize as a crucial food source. Neglecting farmer knowledge and perceptions: There was lack of dialogic interactions to leverage farmers’ existing knowledge about farming conditions and their perceptions.

Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The study recommends, Inclusive Participant Selection: Innovators in agriculture should ensure a more balanced selection of stakeholders through participatory approaches to ensure the inclusion of farmers from various socio-economic backgrounds as well as agricultural extension officers who are key players in agriculture. This will facilitate a more comprehensive understanding of the diverse information needs, existing community knowledge and perceptions. Value-centric communication: Communication activities should be designed actively with the involvement of stakeholders and should provide avenues for farmers to voice the values they associate with foods and their traditional agricultural practices. This can help tailor agricultural innovations to better meet their needs and preferences. Leverage farmers’ existing knowledge about farming: Innovators in agriculture should establish platforms for dialogic interaction where farmers can share their knowledge and perceptions about farming conditions and agricultural innovations. This can enhance the relevance and effectiveness of innovative agricultural practices by integrating local insights.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baffoe-Asare R. Danquah J. A & Annor-Frempong F., 2013. Socioeconomic Factors Influencing Adoption of Codapec and Cocoa High-tech Technologies among Small Holder Farmers in Central Region of Ghana, American Journal of Experimental Agriculture

Campos F.C and Anderso G. L. 2022. An Introduction to Paulo Freire and his Influence on Participatory Action Research in Handbook of Participatory Research and Inquiry

Cornish F., Breton N.,Tabarez U. N., Jenna Delgado J.,Mohi Rua M., Ama de-Graft Aikins A.,& Darrin Hodgetts 2023,.Participatory action research. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 2023, Number 1. Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Curry G. N, Nake S, Koczberski S, Oswald M, Rafflegeau S, Lummani Peter J, Nailina R. 2021. “Disruptive innovation in agriculture: Socio-cultural factors in technology adoption in the developing world Journal of Rural Studies”. Journal of Rural Studies

DfID, 1999. Communications & Development: a practical guide

European Commission. 2022 Palm oil Barometer: The inclusion of smallholder farmers in the value chain

Freire, Paulo. 2006. Pedagogy of the Oppressed, 30th Anniversary Ed. New York: Continuum

Maharani Dita Novita. 2002. An Evaluation of the Participatory Communication Approach for the Development of the Kotagede Area: A Case Study of the Rekompak-JRF Heritage Extension Programme in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. A Thesis presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School Ateneo de Manila University, Manila University.

ILO, 2022 Action Plan on Gender Equality and Gender Mainstreaming

Kenya Agricultural & Livestock Research Organization (KALRO) 2021, Kalro Strategic Plan, 2017– 2021

Kuehne, G.; Llewellyn, R.; Pannell, D.J.; Wilkinson, R.; Dolling, P.; Ouzman, J.; Ewing, M., 2017. Predicting farmer uptake of new agricultural practices: A tool for research, extension and policy. Agric. Syst.

Mbithi P.M., 1972. Innovation in Rural Development, Discussion Paper No. 158, IDS

Mefalopulos P, 2003 Theory and Practice of Participatory Communication: The case of the FAO Project “Communication for Development in Southern Africa” PhD Dissertation, University of Texas,

Musembi D. N., 1998, the adoption of Katumani maize improved seed varieties in Wote Division, Makueni District, Kenya. UoN

Rao S.V...N, Rangnekar,R, Dey R., and A.W. Van Den Ban A. W ., 1995.Farmer Perceptions of innovations in Handbook for Straw Feeding Systems, ICAR, New Delhi, India

Ricart S, Ingram J, Reddy AA, Cradock-Henry NA and Kirk N (2023). The social side of agroecological systems: farmers' adaptation capacity. Frontiers in Agronomy. Frontiers Media ·

Tanko M. and Ismaila S., 2021. How culture and religion influence the agriculture technology gap in Northern Ghana. World Development Perspectives

Downloads

Published

2025-04-24

How to Cite

Muli, E. K., Sakw, P. M., & Chakava, D. M. H. (2025). Assessing the Integration of Farmer Socio-Cultural Context in the Diffusion of Improved Maize Varieties in the Semi-Arid Lower Eastern Kenya. American Journal of Communication, 7(1), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.47672/ajc.2683

Issue

Section

Articles