BIODIGESTION EFFECTS OF COW DUNG, POULTRY DROPPINGS AND MAIZE COBS ON MICROBIOLOGICAL AND PHYSICO-CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF THE EFFLUENTS

Authors

  • Meyiwa Stephen Chomini Department of Forestry Technology, Federal College of Forestry, Jos, P.M.B. 2019, Bauchi Road, Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria
  • Victoria Ibukun Joshua Department of Forestry Technology, Federal College of Forestry, Jos, P.M.B. 2019, Bauchi Road, Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47672/aja.436
Abstract views: 363
PDF downloads: 222

Keywords:

Bio digestion effects, cow dung, poultry droppings, maize cobs, physico-chemical properties, effluents

Abstract

Purpose: To assess its effects on microbial community, biogas yield and some physico-chemical properties of the effluents.

 Methodology: Triplicate slurries of each of the biomass were separately loaded into locally constructed batch-reactor systems, under strict anaerobic condition and kept for eight(8) week retention period. Separate treatment fractions were subjected to standard methods to determine their microbial contents before and during anaerobic digestion (AD). Weekly variations in temperature and weight were followed during the retention period.

Findings: The microbial isolates included 7fungal species, Six (6) non-methanogens, four (4) methanogens and two (2) yeasts. Only Chaetomium thermophile, Aspergillus fumigates and Aspergillus nidulans were isolated at the 5th WOD. The methanogens were predominantly present throughout the digestion period, with increased frequency of occurrence ranging from 50-100%. There was a general % reduction in total viable counts for all microbial isolates, except for the methanogens, with %increase ranging from 83.48% -205.42%. Treatments E(2961.0ml) and B(1713.2ml) had the highest and lowest significant(p < 0.05) cumulative biogas production, with the co-substrates yielding more than the mono-substrates. All treatments showed progressive temperature rise and average weight loss, which suddenly dropped after the 6th and 4th WOD respectively, with the average weight loss ranging from 23.7±1.9 to 34.3±4.6.

Contribution to theory, practice and policy: There was a strong positive correlation between gas production and weight loss as well as with temperature variation. This initiative engendered alternative energy source, agro-wastes management, while ensuring sustainable environmental rejuvenation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Meyiwa Stephen Chomini, Department of Forestry Technology, Federal College of Forestry, Jos, P.M.B. 2019, Bauchi Road, Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria

Department of Forestry Technology, Federal College of Forestry, Jos, P.M.B. 2019, Bauchi Road, Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria

Victoria Ibukun Joshua, Department of Forestry Technology, Federal College of Forestry, Jos, P.M.B. 2019, Bauchi Road, Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria

Department of Forestry Technology, Federal College of Forestry, Jos, P.M.B. 2019, Bauchi Road, Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria

 

 

References

Alfa, M. I., Adie, D. B., Igboro, S. B., Oranusi, U. S., Dahunsi, S. O. & Akali, D. M. (2014). Assessment of biofertilizer quality and health implications of anaerobic digestion effluent of cow dung and chicken droppings. Renewable Energy, 63, 681 – 686.

Asikong, B. E., Udensi,O. U., Epoke, J., Eja, E. M. & Antai,E. E. (2014). Microbial Analysis and Biogas Yield of Water Hyacinth, Cow Dung and Poultry Dropping Fed Anaerobic Digesters. British Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 4(4), 650-661.

Babaee, A., Shayegan,J. and Roshani,A (2013).Anaerobic slurry co-digestion of poultry manureand straw: effect of organic loading andtemperature. Journal of Environmental Health Sciences & Engineering. 11:15.

Balch, W. E., Fox, G. E., Maram, L. J., Woese, C. R. & Wolfe, R. S. (1979). Methanogens: Re-evaluation of a unique biological group. Microbiol. Rev.43: 260-296.

Bhattacharya, T. K, & Mishra, T. N. (2005). Biodegradability of Dairy Cattle Manure under Dry Anaerobic Fermentation Process. Journal of Institute of Engineers (India). Agricultural Engineering Division, 84, 9-11.

Bolarinwa, O.A. and Ugoji, E. O.(2010). Production of Biogas from Starchy Wastes. Journal of Sci. Res. 12, 34 – 45.

Bolzonella D., Battistoni P., Susini C., & Cecchi F., [2006]. Anaerobic codigestion ofwaste activated sludge and OFMSW: theexperiences of Viareggio and Treviso plants(Italy). Water Science and Technology 53,203–211.

Chae, K. J., Jang, A., Kim, I.S., & Yim, S. K.(2008). The effect of digestion temperature andtemperature shock on the biogas yields from the mesophilic anaerobicdigestion of swine manure. Bioresour Technol. 99:1–6.

Chen, Y, Cheng, J. J. & Creamer, K. S. (2008). Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: a review. Bioresources Technology, 99, 4044–4064.

Chomini, M. S. (2017).Comparative Studies on Biogas Production From Some Selected Indigenous Substrates and the effects of Their End-Products on Growth and Performance of Zea Mays L.(Maize)(Ph.D Thesis), Department of Plant Science and Technology, University of Jos, Nigeria. 589p.

Chomini, M. S. Ogbonna, C.I.C., Falemara, B.C. & Micah, P. (2015).Effect of Co-Digestion of Cow Dung and Poultry Manure on Biogas Yield, Proximateand Amino Acid Contents of Their Effluents.IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science (IOSR-JAVS) 8, (11) I , 48-56.

Choorit, W. & Wisarnwan, P. (2007). Effect of temperature on the anaerobic digestion of palm oil mill effluent. Electron. Journal of Biotechnology, 10, 376–385.

De Gioannis, G., Muntoni, A., Cappai, G. & Milia, S. (2009). Landfill Gas Generation after Mechanical Biological Treatment of Municipal Solid Waste: Estimation of Gas Generation Rate Constants. Waste Management, 29, 1026-1034.

El-Mashad, H. M. & Zhang, R. (2010). Biogas production from co-digestion of dairy manure and food waste. Bioresource Technology, 101, 4021–4028.

Esposito, G., Frunzo, L., Giordano, A., Liotta, F., Panico, A. & Pirozzi, F.(2012). Anaerobic co-digestion of organic wastes. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol. 1-17.

Eze J. I. & Agbo K. E. (2010). Studies on the microbial spectrum in anaerobic biomethannization of cow dung in 10 m3 fixed dome biogas digester. International Journal of the Physical Sciences 5(8), 1331-1337.

Franke-Whittle, I. H., Confalonieri, A., Insam, H., Schlegelmilch, M.& Körner, I.(2014). Changes in the microbial communities during co-compostingof digestates.Waste Management.34, 632–641.

Fulladosa, E., Murat, J. C., Martínez, M.& Villaescusa, I. (2005a). Patterns of metals and arsenic poisoning in Vibrio fischeri. Chemosphere, 60, 43-48.

Fulladosa, E., Murat, J. C. & Villaescusa, I. (2005b). Study on the toxicity of binary equitoxic mixtures of metals using the luminescent bacteria Vibrio fischeri as a biological target. Chemosphere.58, 551-557.

Gao, W. J., Leung, K. T., Qin, W. S., & Liao B. Q. (2011). Effects of temperature and temperature shock on the performance and microbial community structure of a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor. Bioresource Technology, 102, 8733–8740.

Jafari,A., Afazeli,H. Rafiee,S., Nosrati, M.& Almasi,F.(2014). Investigation Yield and Energy Balances for Biogas Production from Cow and Poultry Manure. International Journal Of Renewable Energy Research.4, (2),312-320.

Hunter-Cevera, J. C, M. E. Fonda, & A. Belt. (1986). Isolation of cultures. pp. 14, in Manual of industrial microbiology and biotechnology (A. L. Demain and N. A. Solomon, eds.). American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C., 466 pp.

Jha, A. K., Li, J., Zhang, L., Ban, Q. & Jin, Y. (2013). Comparison between Wet and Dry Anaerobic Digestions of Cow Dung under Mesophilic and Thermophilic Conditions. Advances in Water Resource and Protection, 1(2), 28-38.

Jha, S. N, Narsaiah, K, Sharma, A. D., Singh M, Bansal, S, & Kumar, R. (2010a). Quality parameters of mango and potential of non-destructive techniques for their measurement – a review. Journal of Food Science Technology, 47(1), 1–14.

Khalid, A. & Naz,S. (2013). Isolation and Characterization of Microbial Community in Biogas Production from Different Commercially Active Fermentors in Different Regions of Gujranwala. International Journal of Water Resources and Environmental Sciences, 2(2), 28-33.

Kassuwi, S. A. A., Mshandete A. M. & Kivaisi A. K.(2012). Anaerobic Co-Digestion Of Biological Pre-Treated Nile Perch Fish Solid Waste With Vegetable Fraction of Market Solid Waste. ARPN Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science.1016-1031.

Kuang, Y. (2002). Enhancing Anaerobic Degradation of Lipids in Wastewate by Addition of Co-strates.Ph.DThesis, School of Environmental Science, Murdoch University. 9-33.

Kumar, S., Mondal, A.N., Gaikward, S.A., Devotta, S. & Singh, R.N. (2004) QualitativeAssessment of Methane Emission Inventory from Municipal solid WasteDisposal Sites: A Case Study. Atmospheric Environment , 38, 4921-4929.

Lebiocka,M., Montusiewicz, A. & Depta, M.(2016). Co-digestion of Sewage Sludge and Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste in the Aspect of Heavy Metals Content. Middle Pomeranian Scientific Society Of The Environment Protection Annual Set The Environment Protection. 18, 555-566. ISSN 1506-218X.

Li, J., Jha, A. K., He, J., Ban, Q., Chang, S. & Wang, P. (2011). Assessment of the effects of dry anaerobic codigestion of cow dung with waste water sludge on biogas yield and biodegradability. International Journal of the Physical Sciences, 6(15), 3723-3732.

Matheri, A.N., Belaid, M., Seodigeng, T. & Ngila, J. C.(2016). The Role of Trace Elements on Anaerobic Co-digestion in Biogas Production. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering 2016 Vol II WCE 2016, June 29 - July 1, 2016, London, U.K.

Mshandete, A.M. & Parawira, W. (2009) Biogas Technology Research in SelectedSub-Saharan African Countries: A Review. African Journal of Biotechnology, 8,116-125.

Ofoefule, A. U., Nwankwo, J. I. & Ibeto, C. N. (2010). Biogas Production from Paper Waste and its blend with Cow dung. Advances and Applied Sciences Research, 1 (2), 1-8.

Ofosu, M.A. & Aklaku, E.D. (2010). Determining The Optimum Proportion of Shea Waste in Anaerobic Co-Fermentation Process.

Ogundero, S. K.(1981). Thermophilic fungi from Nigeria palm produce. Mycologia, 1981;13 (1). 198 –200.

Okewale, A.O.,Omoruwou, F. & Anih, C.E. (2018) Productionof Biogas from Co-Digestion ofCow Dung, Saw Dust and Maize Husk.Advances in Chemical Engineering andScience, 8, 113-123.

Oyewole, O. A. (2010). Biogas Production From Chicken Droppings Biogas Production From Chicken Droppings. Science World Journal, 5(4), 11-14.

Parawira, W., & Mshandete A.M., [2009]. Biogas technology research in selected sub-Saharan African countries - A review. Afr. J Biotechnology. 8, 116-125.

Prasad, R. D. (2012). Empirical Study on Factors Affecting Biogas Production. International Scholarly Research Network ISRN Renewable Energy, 1-7.

Rehl, T. & Mu¨ller, J. (2011). Life cycle assessment of biogas digestateprocessing technologies. Resour Conserv Recycl56:92–104.

Schafer, W., Letho, M.& Teye, F. (2006). Dry anaerobic digestion of organic residuce on farm a feasibility study. MTT. Vihti Finland. Agricultural food Research Reports, 77, 1-64.

St-Pierre, B. & Wright, A. D. G. (2013). Metagenomic analysis of methanogen populations in three full-scale mesophilic anaerobic manure digesters operated on dairy farms in Vermont, USA. Bioresource Technology, 138, 277-284.

Teo, K. C. & Teoh, S. M.(2011).Preliminary biological screening of microbes isolated from cow dung in Kampar.African Journal of Biotechnology Vol. 10(9), pp. 1640-1645,

Wu, X., Yao, W.,Zhu, J.& Miiler, C.(2010). Biogas and CH4Productivity by Codigesting Swine manure with three crop residues as an external carbon source. Bioresour Technol 101,4042-4047.

Downloads

Published

2019-11-29

Issue

Section

Articles